当前位置:首页 > 翻译资源

定性研究设计干预论文翻译-中英对照

发布时间:2014-9-17      阅读次数:2073

定性研究设计干预论文翻译-中英对照
比如实验者会特地排除干预来测定干预的影响(由下例所示)。设计后期可以重复使用干预。
比如:干预组O1 X O2X O3
      对比组O1  O2  O3
或者 干预组O1 X O2X O3 X O4
     对比组O1  O2  O3   O4
8.时间序列设计(包括或不包括对比组)里包含对比变量,或者排除/重复干预:
时间序列设计可以和设计6,7结合。
 
图表10 试验中的假定结果是由断点回归设计推导的。图示中干预的目的是降低pre-和post-方面的得分。
 
图表11 包含对比组,使用时间序列分析的设计,显示了引进危机干预服务的效果(由Delaney, Seidman 和Willis,1978, 由普莱南出版公司出

版。)
图表12 定性研究设计
7. 人性化服务中与工作家分享心理学
本章是关于在进行与他人或他人问题直接相关的工作时,理解和回应他人问题的分享心理学方法。这些“他人工作”包括卫生访视员,教师,

医生、护士、警察和神职人员,这仅仅是举例了一小部分。个性化服务工作家的现代部队所做的工作大部分是心理学的。而且,如第3章中已经

提到的,心理问题在成人和儿童中很普遍,远高于让每个人都获得专业心理学帮助的水平。然而,教师、护士、社会工作家,律师和其他工作

家,这些人需要处理更困难更值得忧虑的心理学问题。但是心理学却不是他们培训的重点,理解和回应心理困难也不是他们进行工作时优先考

虑的问题。
这也是寻求分享心理学的构想,以及介入人性化服务工作家,成为社会心理学主要关注的事情的原因。从社会心理学方面,普通医院的护士和

病人之间,家庭暴力的警察和受害者之间,教师和问题学生之间,相比较少数的,可由心理学专家解决的个人问题,对于社会的心理学健康影

响更深远。后者可用Miller(1969)的著名表述,对于护士、警察和老师,这些实际上真正的心理学从业者,“给予心理距离”。
这在于心理学中是毋庸置疑的,然而有些人主张广泛分享心理学的智慧和专业会冲淡其影响,失去了对于心理学工作的控制,在过程中也会危

及心理学作为专业学科的新兴发展。
(O1.1=情境1下对变量1的估测
  O2.1=情境1下对变量2估测)
Intervention (or repeated) intervention design.
Such as these were specially to rule out intervention to determine the effect of intervention (by example shown below). Late design can be repeated use of intervention.
Such as: intervention group O1 X O2X O3
Control group O1 O2 O3
O1 O2X O3 X X m1 or intervention group
Control group O1 O2 O3 m1
8. The time sequence design (including or not including contrast group) contains variables, or exclude/repeat intervention:
Time series can be designed and design 6, 7.
The chart assumes that the results of the 10 trials is by breakpoint regression design method. Intervention in the graphic purpose is to reduce the pre - and post - in terms of scoring.
Chart 11 contains the comparison group, the design of the using time series analysis, shows the introduction of the effect of crisis intervention services (by Delaney, Seidman and Willis, 1978, published by at south publishing company.)
Diagram 12 qualitative research design
7. Share with work home psychology in the humanized service
This chapter is about the question is directly related to work with others or others, to understand and respond to others sharing the psychology problem. These "other people" including health visitors, teachers, doctors, nurses, police officers and members of the clergy, this is only for a small part. Personalized service home modern forces do psychology most of the work. Also, as already mentioned in chapter 3, psychological problems are common in adults and children, is much higher than that everyone can get the level of professional psychological help. However, teachers, nurses, social workers, lawyers and other work, these people need to deal with more difficult and more psychological problems worthy of concern. But it is not their psychology training focus, understand and respond to psychological difficulties is not a priority when they work.
This is also seeking to share the idea of psychology, as well as intervention humanized service work, things become the main focus of social psychology. From the aspects of social psychology, common hospital between nurses and patients, between the police and the victims of domestic violence, between teachers and problem students, compared to a few, but by personal psychology expert to solve the problem, for the social psychology health effects more profound. Famous expression which is usable Miller (1969), for a nurse, a policeman and a teacher, these actually psychology practitioners, "psychological distance".
This is the psychology is beyond doubt, however, some people advocate the psychology of widely Shared wisdom and professional will dilute the impact, lose the control for the work of psychology, in the process also endangers the emerging development of psychology as a professional discipline.
(O1.1 = situation of variables under 1 1 estimate
O2.1 = situation of variables under 1 2 estimates)

2014.9.17

  返回>>Top
-x