宣告专利权无效意见陈述
Statement on Opinion of Declaring Invalidation of Patent Right
一,本专利不具备创造性
I. This patent does not have creativity
1,本专利权利要求1是由以下必要技术特征构成:A.一种迎风转动体类型和具有一个塔(2)类型的风车,该塔用来可转动地支撑固定一大体水平伸出地携带一叶片转子的主轴(6)的风车壳体(4); B.叶片转子上的叶片转子轮毂处向外延伸到前端区,该前端区处于通过叶片中心轴线在叶片(10)根部形成的平面内从轮毂(8)向外延伸,并在离开轮毂(8)的一定距离后和至少沿着叶片(10)外部三分之一以向外并向前弯曲的方式延伸.
1. Claim of this patent right: 1 was constituted by the following technical features: A one windmill with a rotor type and one windmill with a tower type. This tower may rotationally support a main shaft (6) with one blade rotor extending horizontally; B the hub of blade rotor may extend to the front side, and this section is located in the central axis of blade rotor (10), and continue to extend from the plate of the end of blade hub (8), distant from the hub (8) with a considerable distance and at least along the 1/3 part of blade (10) extending forward in a bending mode.
对比文件1是上海科学技术出版社于1990年5月出版的<<风力机设计与应用>>,早于本专利的优先权日1997年9月4日,可以作为评判本专利的创造性. 在对比文件1第48-49页中公开了风轮迎风转动的上风向(前置式)风车形式,风轮可通过一水平主轴安装在塔架上,风轮可设有双叶片,三叶片,四叶片. 对比文件1第94-97页中还公开了风车的轮毂和机舱,机舱设在塔架的上方水平轴风力发电机的电机,主轴,控制系统的一部分以及增速机构等都安装在该机舱内. 可见,机舱相当于本专利的壳体(4),只是名称的叫法不同而已. 在风轮旋转时,其叶片是在一个沿塔架向下延伸的下部位置与一个从塔架顶部向上伸出的上部位置之间运动. 显然,本专利必要技术特征A,B,C已被对比文件1所公开.
Comparing document is the “Design and application of windmill” published by Shanghai Science and technology Press in May 1990. Early in 4th September 1997, earlier to the priority date of this patent may counted as the creativity of this patent. The comparing document 1 page 48-49 published the windmill form of upwind (prefix model) in windmill with a rotor type, which may install on the shelf through one horizontal shaft? The windmill equipped with double-vane, three-vane and four-vane. In comparing document 1 page 94-97 also published the hub of windmill and its cabin. The motor of air driven generator, axle, part of controlling system and speed accelerate structure located in horizontal direction of the upper tower are all installed inside the cabin. In this way, the cabin is equal to the housing (4) of this patent, just using different name. When wind wheel is rotating, the blade rotor shall be moved between a lower part extending from tower and a upper part extending from the top of the tower. Obviously, the necessary technology A,B and C of this patent have been published by the comparing document.
对比文件2时一篇美国专利(专利号:4550259),于1985年10月29日公开,早于本专利的优先权日,可以作为评判本专利创造性的证据.对比文件2中的图10,图11以及说明书中问译文第3页第30-33行中公开了风轮上的叶片是从转轴处向外延伸到前端区,该前端区处于通过叶片中心轴线在叶片根部形成的平面前面的移动距离上,其在所述平面内从轮毂向外延伸,并在离开转轴的一定距离后向外并向前弯曲的方式延伸. 对比文件1第142-143公开的风轮叶片是采用玻璃钢制造,玻璃钢属于弹性材料是公知常识. 因此,本专利的必要技术特征D,E已被对比文件1,2所公开. 此外,对比文件3,4,5也部分地公开了本专利的必要技术特征. 同时,相对上述对比文件,本专利权利要求1所限定的技术方案并没有产生新的,意想不到的技术效果,因此,本专利权利要求1不具有创造性.
Comparing document 2 is an article of American patent (patent number:4550259), which published on 29th October 1985 earlier to the priority date of this patent may counted as the creativity of this patent. The chart 10 and chart 11 in the comparing document 2 as well as 30-33 lines of the third page in translated instruction published the blade rotor of wind wheel was stretched out from rotary-shaft to front part. This front part located on the distance between central axle of blade rotor and the plate form by the basis of blade foundation. The mentioned plate stretch out from hub, and distance to rotated axle with a considerable distance and extending forward in a bending way. The 142-143 of comparing document published the wind wheel blade was applied the manufacture technology of glass-fiber plastic material. It is a common sense that glass-fiber plastic materials belong to elastic material. So the necessary technology feature of this patent D and E had published by comparing document 1 and 2. Besides, comparing document 3,4 and 5 also published the partial necessary technology feature of this patent. In the same time, comparing to the above documents, the defined technology plan of claim of this patent were not produce a new and unexpected technology result, so the claim of this patent is not equip with creativity.