2,本专利权利要求2的附加技术特征为:其中该叶片弯曲造成叶片前端的向前布置,其幅度与叶片根部的半径基本相同.在权利要求1不具备创造性的情况下,权利要求2限定的技术方案不能产生新的,有益的技术效果,因而无疑也不具备创造性.
2. The attached technology feature of claim 2 in this patent as following: the bend result the forward layout of blade. The range and the radius of blade foundation are basically equal. Under this condition that claim 1 is not equipped with the creativity, the defined technology plan of claim 2 of this patent were not produce a new and beneficial technology result. So it was not equipped with creativity undoubtedly.
二,本专利权利要求书得不到说明书的支持
2. Claim of this patent has no instruction support
本专利权利要求1中的必要技术特征”叶片转子包括三个径向伸出的叶片的轮毂”, “叶片转子的直径大体上相当于塔的高度,致使在叶片转子旋转期间,每个叶片将在一个沿着该塔向下延伸的下部位置与一个基本上从该塔的顶部向上伸出的上部位置之间运动”,”叶片转子上的叶片从转子轮毂处向外延伸到前端区”, “叶片为弹性类型,其在所述平面内从轮毂向外延伸” 等已超出说明书记载的内容, 因此, 本专利权利要求1得不到说明书的支持.
The necessary technology feature of claim 1 in this patent “blade rotors include three hub of rotor in radial orientation”, “the diameter of blade rotor was estimated as the height as tower, so each rotor may move between the lower position extending downward from tower and basically upper position extending upward form the top of tower”, “the blade of blade rotor extending from front part of hub” and “blades belong to elastic type, the mentioned plate extending from hub to outside”, etc. had beyond the content of instruction. So claim of this patent has no instruction support.
综上所述,由于本专利权利要求1,2相对于现有技术不具备创造性,并且本专利权利要求书没有以说明书为依据,说明要求专利保护的范围. 因此,应当依法宣告该专利权无效.
To sum up, the claim1, 2 of this patent compare to the present technology were no equipped with creativity, and the claim were not illustrated the protecting scope of patent in accordance with the instruction. So it is necessary to announce the invalidation of this in accordance with the law.
意见陈述书
Opinion statement
根据无效请求人于2005年5月16日提交的宣告专利权无效意见陈述,本申请人现陈述意见如下:
In accordance with the invalidation opinion statement of claimed patent submit by invalidation applicant on 16th may 2005, the opinion statement of this applicant as follows:
- 无效请求人已将本专利的权利要求1划分为下面的特征:(A)一种迎风转动体类型和具有一个塔(2)类型的风车,该塔用来可转动地支承固定已大体水平伸出的携带一叶片转子的主轴;(B)叶片转子包括有三个径向伸出的叶片(10)的轮毂(8);(C)该风车只有一个这种叶片转子,其直径大体上相当于塔(2)的高度,致使在塔叶片转子旋转期间,每个叶片(10)将在一个沿着该塔(2)向下延伸的下部位置与一个基本上从该塔的顶部向上伸出的上部位置之间运动;(D)其中叶片转子上的叶片从转子轮毂处向外延伸到前端区,该前端区处于通过叶片中心轴线在叶片(10)根部形成的平面前面的一定距离上;(E)该叶片(10)为弹性类型,其在所述平面内从轮毂(8)向外延伸,并在离开轮毂(8)的一定距离后和至少沿着叶片(10)外部三分之一以向外并向前弯曲的方式延伸.
The invalidation applicant has divided the claim1 as following features: (A) one windmill with a rotor type and one windmill with a tower type (2). This tower may rotationally support main shaft with one blade rotor extending horizontally; (B) blade rotors include three hub (8) of rotor (10) in radial orientation the hub of blade rotor may extend to the front side, and this section is located in the central axis of blade rotor (10); (C) only this wind wheel has the blade of this type, the diameter of blade rotor was estimated as the height as tower (2), so each rotor (10)may move between the lower position extending downward from tower and basically upper position extending upward form the top of tower (2); (D) the blade rotor of wind wheel was stretched out from rotary-shaft to front part. This front part located on the distance between central axles of blade rotor (10) and the plate form by the basis of blade foundation. (E) The blade rotors belong to elastic materials, and continue to extend from the plate of blade rotor hub (8), distant from the hub (8) with a considerable distance and at least along the 1/3 part of blade extending forward in a bending mode.